GO WITH Confidence.

Mobridge Regional
Hospital & Clinics

PROJEX

Full Stack Digital Partner

2040 W Main St. Ste. 304, Rapid City, SD 57702  |  605.939.0709  |  reach@projex.co

PROJEX

GAPS + CONFIRMATIONS

GAPS

Schedule

  • No budget range or grant ceiling
  • No target go-live date
  • Award is listed as 24 Sep and 1 Oct
  • A late grant may move the contract only
  • Phase one versus optional is unclear
  • Written questions are due today

questionsA + Bto confirm

needed for a reliable timeline

Inventory

  • Section 4 still reads “[Insert estimate]”
  • No page, PDF, or media count
  • Migrate versus rewrite is undefined
  • Writers and approvers are not named
  • Renovation photo and video are “possibly”
  • TAO export capability is unknown
  • MABU, hosting, and DNS are unknown

questionsC1–C3to confirm

needed to estimate migration

Platform

  • Platform is listed as “WordPress or comparable”
  • Custom admin and API are not confirmed
  • HIPAA forms versus WordPress plugins
  • UKG widget versus API synchronization
  • WCAG AA and Core Web Vitals evidence
  • Who patches production after launch

questionsD3–D7to confirm

needed before architecture

PLEASE CONFIRM

Owners

C2 · H2
  • Day-to-day owner besides HR
  • Marketing, IT, and HIM
  • Design review rounds
  • Number of CMS users
  • Proposal contact
  • Committee versus single owner

Live Extras

C4 · C5
  • Foundation and donate pages, Education calendar, Student opportunities, Virtual tour
  • Branding — identity, logo system,
    print / digital kit
  • Discoverability — SEO, SMO, AI — on-page, technical, local

Custom Option

D3–D4
  • Staff admin and API allowed?
  • Price WordPress and custom
  • Source-code ownership
  • SSO and U.S. hosting rules
  • HIPAA forms path
  • Who hosts after launch

Integrations

E1–E3
  • UKG widget or API
  • Retire or rebuild the on-site job application?
  • Bill-pay vendor, Patient portal and Phreesia
  • CMS machine-readable price file
  • Link, widget, or API

HIPAA / BAA

G1–G2
  • Which forms may collect PHI
  • Should a BAA be assumed?
  • Newborn photo gallery
  • Testimonials and consent
  • Plugin versus BAA

Scoring

H1
  • Section 9 skips to Section 11
  • Evaluation criteria are missing
  • May scoring weights be shared?
  • Format and page limits
  • Oral interview

Inventory, integrations, and HIPAA forms cannot be priced without answers.
Grant funding may change phase one — not whether the site gets built.

P/ 2

GO WITHConfidence.

PROJEX

WORDPRESS + CUSTOM

Hybrid is recommended unless custom work is not permitted.

APPROACH

WordPress

  • News, Foundation, and education
  • Careers storytelling
  • Redirects and on-page SEO
  • GTM and analytics
  • Official embeds only
  • MyMobridge and Phreesia links
  • No PHI stored in the CMS

OKif WordPress is required

OR with plugin and AA tradeoffs

Hybrid

  • Public site and staff admin
  • API for directories
  • UKG listings kept current
  • Form API, with no PHI in the CMS
  • Price-file endpoint
  • Staff can edit without a developer
  • Owned handoff, or hosted and maintained by PROJEX
  • Optional branding: identity, logo system, print / digital kit

RECrecommended approach

OR two separately priced options

Custom API

  • HIPAA forms and a BAA-capable host
  • UKG feed or API synchronization
  • CMS machine-readable price file
  • Provider and location source of truth
  • Department-level editors
  • AA and Core Web Vitals evidence
  • A smaller, vendor-owned codebase

USEwhen WordPress cannot

OR sync and a BAA need custom

WORDPRESS LIMITS

HIPAA Forms

Custom API
  • Many plugins store PHI
  • Hosts often decline a BAA
  • Encryption and retention
  • Keep PHI out of the CMS

UKG Sync

Custom Work
  • A widget is acceptable
  • An API avoids double entry
  • Retire the on-site form?
  • Not a WordPress plugin

Price File

Endpoint
  • The live site uses static PDFs
  • A machine-readable file is required
  • Versioned chargemaster
  • Not a WordPress page

Directory

Content API
  • Six locations
  • Clinic-level editors
  • One source of truth
  • Reusable for later work

AA + CWV

Front End
  • Page builders often fail AA
  • Plugin stacks often fail Core Web Vitals
  • A VPAT or third-party audit is needed
  • API and custom front end

Security

Secure Backend
  • Fewer plugins
  • Room for future interfaces
  • A clear owner for patches
  • A BAA-capable host

MyMobridge, Phreesia, and bill pay should use official embeds only, not a rebuild.
A custom admin and API are needed where WordPress cannot meet the RFP.

P/ 3

GO WITHConfidence.

PROJEX

ASK + CLARIFY

@ Full questions list on P/ 5 — sent to danielle.keller@mobridgehospital.org

QUESTIONS

A + B + C

A1
Today’s question cutoff and timezone
A2
24 September versus 1 October award
A3
Go-live if the grant is delayed
B1
Budget or grant ceiling
B2
Phase one versus optional
B3
Grant reporting dates
C1
Replace “[Insert estimate]”
C2
Migrate versus rewrite
C3
Photography, video, and tour
C4
Foundation, extras, and branding
C5
Discoverability — SEO, SMO, AI — not listed in the RFP

11questionsSchedule + Budget + Content

D + E

D1
TAO export, MABU, and DNS
D2
Hosting and HIPAA hosting
D3
Custom admin allowed?
D4
Price WordPress and custom
D5
Code ownership and handoff
D6
Disallowed stacks, SSO, and users
D7
Who patches production
E1
UKG product and the current job form
E2
Portal, Phreesia, and bill pay
E3
Which APIs can be authorized

10questionsPlatform + Integrations

F + G + H

F1
Provider count and source
F2
Clinic brand treatment
G1
PHI forms and a BAA
G2
Gallery and testimonials
G3
AA evidence and languages
H1
Missing Section 10
H2
Owner besides HR
H3
Insurance and contract terms
H4
Proposal format limits

9questionsDirectory + Legal + Process

PLEASE SEND

A3 Go-live

Provide
  • What date should the new site launch, and does a late grant move that date?

C1 Count

Provide
  • Please replace “[Insert estimate]” with page, news, PDF, and media counts.

D3 Custom

Provide
  • Is a staff admin and API acceptable if non-technical staff can still edit?

E1 UKG

Provide
  • Which UKG product, widget or API, and should the current job form be retired or rebuilt?

G1 BAA

Provide
  • Which forms may collect PHI, and should vendors assume a BAA?

H1 Score

Provide
  • Was Section 10 meant to be evaluation criteria? Please share categories and weights.

The full numbered list is on P/ 5.
Each question maps to an RFP gap that changes price, timeline, or legal risk.

P/ 4

GO WITHConfidence.

PROJEX

QUESTIONS + DETAIL

@ Full numbered list — sent to danielle.keller@mobridgehospital.org

A. Schedule + Award

A1
Confirm questions submitted 27 August 2026 will be answered and shared with all vendors. What is the cutoff time and timezone?
A2
Which award dates govern: the header (1 October) or Section 7 (selection 24 September, contract 1 October)?
A3
What is the target go-live date? If the grant decision slips, does launch move with contract signature?

B. Budget + Phasing

B1
What is the budget range or grant ceiling, and which costs may the grant cover?
B2
If funding is partial, what is phase one versus optional — virtual tour, custom directory, UKG API, new photography?
B3
Are there grant reporting or deliverable dates?

C. Content + Inventory

C1
Please replace Section 4 “[Insert estimate]” with page, news, PDF, and media counts, or provide a sitemap export.
C2
Should existing content be migrated as-is, lightly edited, or rewritten? Who writes, who approves, and how many review rounds?
C3
Are renovation photography, video, and a virtual tour in the base bid or optional? Are existing rights available?
C4
Confirm extras in scope: Foundation and donate pages, education calendar, newborn gallery, student opportunities, testimonials, and the current job application. Branding — identity, logo system, and a print / digital kit — is available even if not requested. Refresh the identity, or keep the current one?
C5
Discoverability — SEO, SMO, AI — on-page, technical, local — were not listed in the RFP. Should they be included?

D. Platform + Hosting

D1
Can TAO export content? Is Agency MABU still under contract? Who hosts and controls the domain, DNS, and SSL?
D2
Hospital-hosted, vendor-hosted, or no preference? Any U.S. residency, HIPAA hosting, or backup and recovery requirements?
D3
Is a custom staff admin, API, and public site acceptable if non-technical staff can still update the site?
D4
May vendors price a WordPress-only option and a custom admin / API option as two separately priced approaches?
D5
Who owns source code after launch? Should the bid include an owned handoff package, or hosting and maintenance by PROJEX?
D6
Are any technology stacks disallowed? How many department-level CMS users? Is Microsoft 365 or other SSO required for admin access?
D7
Who patches production after launch — Hospital IT, a vendor retainer, or a third party?

E. Integrations

E1
Which UKG product is in use, and is a widget, feed, or API available? Should the current on-site job application be retired or rebuilt?
E2
For MyMobridge, Phreesia, bill pay, and price transparency: deep link, official widget, or API? Who is the bill-pay vendor? Must the CMS machine-readable price file be published and kept current?
E3
If a custom API is allowed, which of those systems have APIs the Hospital can authorize?

F. Directory + Locations

F1
About how many providers, and what is the source of truth? Who maintains profiles after launch?
F2
Prairie Sunset Village and the clinics: one brand treatment, or distinct identities?

G. Compliance + Privacy

G1
Which forms may collect PHI, and should vendors assume a BAA is required?
G2
Do the newborn gallery and testimonials remain in scope? What consent process applies?
G3
What WCAG 2.1 AA evidence is required — checklist, VPAT, or third-party audit? Any language other than English?

H. Governance

H1
Was Section 10 meant to be evaluation criteria? If so, please share categories and weights.
H2
Who is the day-to-day owner besides HR, and who approves design?
H3
Are there required insurance limits or Hospital contract terms beyond a vendor sample SOW?
H4
Are there proposal format, page, or file-size limits?

Answers will be shared with all vendors who received the RFP.
Each question maps to an RFP gap that changes price, timeline, or legal risk.

P/ 5

GO WITHConfidence.

Thank you

Adam Bauerle Technical Director adam@projex.co 605.939.0124

PROJEX

Full Stack Digital Partner

2040 W Main St. Ste. 304, Rapid City, SD 57702  |  605.939.0709  |  reach@projex.co

GO WITH Confidence.